Characterising trends in the initiation, timing, and completion of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process: Retrospective analysis of routine data from a large UK hospital trust.

AIM: To assess patient socio-demographic and disease characteristics associated with the initiation, timing, and completion of emergency care and treatment planning in a large UK-based hospital trust. METHODS: Secondary retrospective analysis of data across 33 months extracted from digitally stored Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plans within the electronic health record system of an acute hospital trust in England, UK. RESULTS: Data analysed from ReSPECT plans (n = 23,729), indicate an increase in the proportion of admissions having a plan created from 4.2% in January 2019 to 6.9% in September 2021 (mean = 8.1%). Forms were completed a median of 41 days before death (a median of 58 days for patients with capacity, and 21 days for patients without capacity). Do not attempt resuscitation was more likely to be recorded for patients lacking capacity, with increasing age (notably for patients aged over 74 years), being male, having ethnicity recorded as 'Asian or Asian British' or 'Black or Black British', and the absence of multiple disease groups. Having a preferred place of death recorded as 'hospital' led to a five-fold increase in the likelihood of dying in hospital. CONCLUSION: Variation in the initiation, timing, and completion of ReSPECT plans was identified by applying an evaluation framework. Digital storage of ReSPECT plan data presents opportunities for assessing trends and completion of the ReSPECT planning process and benchmarking across sites. Further research is required to monitor and understand any inequity in the implementation of the ReSPECT process in routine care.

End of Life Care for Unplanned Vascular Admissions.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned vascular admissions have a high mortality. Previous studies have indicated that end of life care (EoLC) among this group of patients is low but there exist limited data on EoLC in the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and predictors of EoLC for unplanned vascular admissions to a tertiary center in the United Kingdom. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of unplanned vascular surgery admissions from August 1, 2019 to January 22, 2020. Data on patient demographics, markers of quality of palliative care, mortality, and cause of death of unplanned admission to the vascular surgery department were collected from hospital and general practitioner records and evaluated against EoLC to evaluate predictors and efficacy of EoLC. Quality of palliative care markers included documentation of preferred place of death and care priorities, time spent in hospital and the intensive care unit toward the end of life, and realization of documented care objectives. EoLC input was defined as a dedicated palliative care consultation (PCC) by a palliative care professional, medical doctor, surgeon, or advanced care practitioner. We also conducted a subgroup analysis of patients within this group with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), diabetic foot, and ruptured aortic aneurysms, as all patients in this group should be offered EoLC according to international guidelines. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty patients were included. Median age at presentation was 70.5 years, and the cohort consisted of mostly men (72%). CLTI (31%) was the most common reason for admission. Surgical intervention was carried out in 60% of patients. Two-year mortality was 36%, and pneumonia (22%) was the most common cause of death. Seven percent of patients received PCC, which occurred a median of 10 days before death. Only a minority of patients had preferred place of care/death (14%), care priorities (37%), and family involvement during advance care planning (17%) documented in their notes; 29% of patients had Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment forms in place. A diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, chronic kidney disease, and increasing age predicted Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment form completion. Patients with PCC were more likely to have advance care planning, but this did not translate into improvements in the other markers of quality of palliative and, consequently, EoLC. CONCLUSIONS: EoLC was insufficient and of low quality despite a high mortality in this group. Clinical guidelines and pathways are needed to ensure these patients are considered for EoLC and those with CLTI, diabetic foot sepsis or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are offered it by default. Further research is needed to help identify vascular patients who would benefit from EoLC earlier to improve quality at end of life.

Exploration of pain assessment and management processes in oncology outpatient services with healthcare professionals: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored cancer pain management practices and clinical care pathways used by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to understand the barriers and facilitators for standardised pain management in oncology outpatient services (OS). DESIGN: Data were collected using semistructured interviews that were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. SETTING: Three NHS trusts with oncology OS in Northern England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty HCPs with varied roles (eg, oncologist and nurse) and experiences (eg, registrar and consultant) from different cancer site clinics (eg, breast and lung). Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: HCPs discussed cancer pain management practices during consultation and supporting continuity of care beyond consultation. Key findings included : (1) HCPs' level of clinical experience influenced pain assessments; (2) remote consulting impeded experienced HCPs to do detailed pain assessments; (3) diffusion of HCP responsibility to manage cancer pain; (4) nurses facilitated pain management support with patients and (5) continuity of care for pain management was constrained by the integration of multidisciplinary teams. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate HCP cancer pain management practices varied and were unstructured. Recommendations are made for a standardised cancer pain management intervention: (1) detailed evaluation of pain with a tailored self-management strategy; (2) implementation of a structured pain assessment that supports remote consultations, (3) pain assessment tool that can support both experienced and less experienced clinicians. These findings will inform the development of a cancer pain management tool to integrate within routine oncology OS.

Eye donation in hospice and hospital palliative care settings: perceptions, practice, and service development needs - findings from a national survey.

OBJECTIVES: New routes for supply of eye tissue are needed in the UK to support transplant surgery and medical research. Hospice care (HC) and Hospital-based Palliative care (HPC) services represent potential supply routes. This paper reports findings from the survey arm of the Eye Donation from Palliative and Hospice Care-Investigating potential, practice preference and perceptions study (EDiPPPP), objectives of which were to: i) Investigate existing practice in relation to eye donation across HC and HPC settings; ii) identify perceptions of HCPs toward embedding eye donation into routine end of life care planning; iii) investigate the informational, training, or support needs of clinicians regarding eye donation. DESIGN: Online survey of UK-based HC and HPC clinicians, distributed through professional organisations (Association of Palliative Medicine (UK); Hospice UK). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six participants completed (63% HC; 37% HPC-8% response rate, of n = 1894 approached). RESULTS: Majority of participants (63%, n = 99) supported raising eye donation (ED) with patients and families and agreed that ED should be discussed routinely with eligible patients. However, 72%, (n = 95) indicated that staff within their clinical setting did not routinely discuss the option of ED in end-of-life care planning conversations with the majority of participants reporting that the option of ED was not 'routinely discussed in multi-disciplinary team or other meetings. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant support, ED is not part of routine practice. Attention to barriers to embedding ED and reducing knowledge deficits are urgently needed to increase the supply of eye tissue for use in transplant operations.

The potential for eye donation from hospice and palliative care clinical settings in England: a retrospective case note review of deceased patients' records.

There is a need to identify additional routes of supply for ophthalmic tissue in the UK. This paper reports the findings from a national study exploring the potential for eye donation (ED) from three Hospice Care (HC) and three Hospital Palliative Care Services (HPC) in England. The objectives addressed in this paper are i.) to establish the size and describe the clinical characteristics of the potential eye donor population across six clinical sites; ii.) to identify challenges for clinicians in applying the standard ED criteria for assessing patient eligibility. Retrospective assessment of 1199 deceased patient case notes, 601 Hospice Care and 598 Hospital Palliative Care services, against current eye donation criteria. Clinicians' assessments were then evaluated against the same criteria. by specialists based at the National Health Service Blood and Transplant Tissue Services division (NHSBT-TS). Results of the assessment and evaluation are reported as descriptive statistics (numerical data). Free-text comment boxes facilitated clarification and/or justification of review and evaluation decisions. 46% (n = 553) of 1199 deceased patients' notes were agreed as eligible for eye donation (Hospice care settings = 56% (n = 337); Palliative care settings = 36% (n = 216). For all eligible cases (n = 553) the option of ED was recorded as being raised with family members in only 14 cases (3%). Significant potential exists for eye donation from the clinical sites in this study. This potential is not currently being realised.

12†The potential for eye donationfrom hospice and palliative care clinical settings in England - a retrospective case notes review of deceased patient records.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify additional routes of supply for ophthalmic tissue in the UK due to deficits between supply and demand. In response to this need the NIHR funded study, Eye Donation from Palliative and Hospice Care: Investigating Potential, Practice, Preference, and Perceptions) (EDiPPPP) project was developed in partnership with NHSBT Tissue Services ( now Organ Tissue Donation and Transplantation). AIM: This presentation will report findings from work package one of EDiPPPP which aimed to: scope the size and clinical characteristics of the potential eye donation (ED) population via a large-scale, multi-site retrospective case notes review across England establishing: the size of the potential ED population; describe the clinical characteristics of the potential ED population and identify challenges for clinicians in applying the standard ED criteria for assessing patient eligibility. RESULTS: Retrospective review of 1200 deceased patient case notes (600 HPC; 600 HPCS) by reviewers (healthcare professionals) at research sites against current ED criteria were then evaluated by specialists based at the National Health Service Blood and Transplant Tissue services (NHSBT-TS). Note review established that 46% (n=553) of 1200 deceased patients notes were agreed as eligible for eye donation (total cases Hospice care settings = 56% (n=337); Palliative care settings = 36% (n=216) with only 1.2% of potential donors referred to NHSBT-TS for eye donation (Hospice care settings = 1.2% (n=4); Palliative care settings = 1.3% (n=3).Application of the eye donation criteria resulted in an 81% agreement rate outcome for all sites (HPC = 79.2%; HPCS = 82.8%). If cases where there was a difference of assessment but where NHSBT evaluation indicated eligibility are included (n=113) the potential donor pool rises from 553 (46.1% total cases) to 666 (56%) eligible cases. CONCLUSIONS: Significant potential exists for eye donation from the clinical sites in this study. This potential is not currently being realised. In view of the predicted increase in need for ophthalmic tissue it is essential that the potential route to increase the supply of ophthalmic tissue demonstrated in this retrospective note review is accessed. The presentation will conclude with recommendations for service development.

10†Eye donation in palliative and hospice care settings: patient views and missed opportunities!

Eye donation in Palliative and Hospice care settings: patient views and missed opportunities. BACKGROUND: There is a global shortage of donated eye tissue for use in sight saving and sight restoring operations such as corneal transplantation. In the UK the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) report that over two million people are currently living with sight loss with this figure predicted to rise to approx. four million by 2050. Patients who die in palliative and hospice care settings could potentially donate eye tissue, however, the option of eye donation is not routinely raised in end-of-life planning discussions. Research evidence suggests that health care professionals (HCP) are reluctant to discuss eye donation as they perceive it as something that will distress patients and family members. AIM: This presentation will share findings regarding the views of patients and carers, including: their feelings and thoughts about the option of eye donation being raised with them; who they think should raise this issue; when this option should be discussed and who should be included in the discussion. FINDINGS: Findings are drawn from the NIHR funded national study: Eye Donation from Palliative and Hospice care contexts: investigating Potential, Practice, Preference and Perceptions (EDiPPPP) in partnership with three palliative care and three hospice care settings in England. Findings indicate high potential for eye donation but very low levels of identification of potential donors; low levels of approach to patients and family members about the option of eye donation; lack of inclusion of eye donation in end-of-life care planning and/or clinical meeting discussions (i.e. Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings) and very limited awareness raising initiatives or activity to inform patients and carers of the option of eye donation. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that patients who would want to be a donor are identified and assessed for eligibility for donation as part of high-quality end of life care. It is clear from studies reported over the past 10 years that not a lot has changed regarding the identification, approach, and referral of potential donors from palliative and hospice care settings, and this is due in part to perceptions held by HCPs that patients would be unwilling to engage in discussions regarding the option of eye donation in advance of their death. This perception that is not substantiated by empirical research.

Advance care planning ahead of life-altering clinical deterioration in secure settings: Do not wait until a crisis.

All professionals involved in someone's care should be equipped to support individuals, and the people close to them, to understand how their health is likely to change, consider the burdens and likely outcomes of treatment options and make realistic, informed recommendations to guide future care. This can be particularly challenging in forensic mental health, when it covers cardiopulmonary resuscitation alongside recommendations about acute hospital admission and medical escalation within and outside of hospital settings. Some clinicians question whether or not the harms of raising the spectre of invasive ventilation and potential mortality risks unnecessary anxiety and psychological harm amongst detained patients. Instead, we argue that timely advance care and treatment escalation planning with each patient, informed by psychiatric clinicians, is long overdue.

An evaluation of advance care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective review of patient involvement in decision making using routinely collected data from digital ReSPECT records.

OBJECTIVE: To review advance care planning (ACP) practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating the number of plans created, patient participation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations and variation between different population groups. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis and comparison of routinely collected data from electronic recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment (ReSPECT) records documented in April 2020 and January to December 2019. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Electronic ReSPECT documents completed for adult patients at a large, acute hospital trust in the UK. RESULTS: The number of plans created per 1,000 admissions in April 2020 was 333.0% higher than in 2019. A greater proportion of plans created during April 2020 were discussed with the patient and the proportion containing a 'for cardiopulmonary resuscitation' recommendation was higher across all population groups. A greater proportion of plans were created for younger adults and Black and minority ethnic groups during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Increased ACP during a crisis can be achieved alongside increased patient participation in decision making. A tool such as ReSPECT that supports recommendations for, as well as limitations on, treatment may have enabled the expansion of ACP observed.

Nutrition and hydration in palliative care.

Anorexia, weight loss and muscle wasting commonly affect people approaching the end of life. It is critical that clinicians caring for people with advanced illness and progressive frailty can assess the nutritional and hydration needs of these people, engage them in shared decision making and support them to plan ahead regarding their nutritional care preferences as their health deteriorates.

Understanding care when cure is not likely for young adults who face cancer: a realist analysis of data from patients, families and healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the experiences of young adults with cancer for whom cure is not likely, in particular what may be specific for people aged 16-40 years and how this might affect care. DESIGN: We used data from multiple sources (semi-structured interviews with people with cancer, nominated family members and healthcare professionals, and workshops) informed by a preliminary programme theory: realist analysis of data within these themes enabled revision of our theory. A realist logic of analysis explored contexts and mechanisms affecting outcomes of care. SETTING: Three cancer centres and associated palliative care services across England. PARTICIPANTS: We aimed for a purposive sample of 45 people with cancer from two groups: those aged 16-24 years for whom there may be specialist cancer centres and those 16-40 years cared for through general adult services; each could nominate for interview one family member and one healthcare professional. We interviewed three people aged 16-24 years and 30 people 25-40 years diagnosed with cancer (carcinomas; blood cancers; sarcoma; central nervous system tumours) with a clinician-estimated prognosis of <12 months along with nominated family carers and healthcare professionals. 19 bereaved family members and 47 healthcare professionals participated in workshops. RESULTS: Data were available from 69 interviews (33 people with cancer, 14 family carers, 22 healthcare professionals) and six workshops. Qualitative analysis revealed seven key themes: loss of control; maintenance of normal life; continuity of care; support for professionals; support for families; importance of language chosen by professionals; and financial concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Current care towards end of life for young adults with cancer and their families does not meet needs and expectations. We identified challenges specific to those aged 16-40 years. The burden that care delivery imposes on healthcare professionals must be recognised. These findings can inform recommendations for measures to be incorporated into services.

Access to hospital and community palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A longitudinal population analysis.

BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service is striving to improve access to palliative care for patients with advanced cancer however limited information exists on the level of palliative care support currently provided in the UK. We aimed to establish the duration and intensity of palliative care received by patients with advanced cancer and identify which cancer patients are missing out. METHODS: Retrospective cancer registry, primary care and secondary care data were obtained and linked for 2474 patients who died of cancer between 2010 and 2012 within a large metropolitan UK city. Associations between the type, duration, and amount of palliative care by demographic characteristics, cancer type, and therapies received were assessed using Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multinomial multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the odds of receiving community and/or hospital palliative care compared to no palliative care by demographic characteristics, cancer type, and therapies received. RESULTS: Overall 64.6% of patients received palliative care. The average palliative care input was two contacts over six weeks. Community palliative care was associated with more palliative care events (p<0.001) for a longer duration (p<0.001). Patients were less likely to receive palliative care if they were: male (p = 0.002), aged 80 years or over (p<0.05), diagnosed with lung cancer (p<0.05), had not received an opioid prescription (p<0.001), or had not received chemotherapy (p<0.001). Patients given radiotherapy were more likely to receive community only palliative care compared to no palliative care (Odds Ratio = 1.49, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.16-1.90). CONCLUSION: Timely supportive care for cancer patients is advocated but these results suggest that older patients and those who do not receive anti-cancer treatment or opioid analgesics miss out. These patients should be targeted for assessment to identify unmet needs which could benefit from palliative care input.

Older age is associated with less cancer treatment: a longitudinal study of English cancer patients.

Background: making informed decisions about cancer care provision for older cancer patients can be challenging and complex. Evidence suggests cancer care varies by age, however the relationship between age and care experiences from diagnosis to death for cancer patients within the UK has not previously been examined in detail. Patients and methods: retrospective cohort linking cancer registry and secondary care data for 13,499 adult cancer patients who died between January 2005 and December 2011. Cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery), hospital palliative care referrals, hospital admissions and place of death were compared between age groups using multivariable regression models. Trends in cancer care over time, overall and within age groups were also assessed. Results: compared with adult patients under 60 years, patients aged 80 years and over were less likely to receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, a hospital palliative care referral; or be admitted to hospital but were more likely to die in a care home. Overall, the percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy, surgery, hospital palliative care referrals and hospital admissions have increased while deaths in hospital have decreased. Deaths at home have increased for patients aged 80 years and over. Conclusion: older patients are less likely to receive cancer therapies or hospital palliative care before death. Further research is needed to identify the extent to which these results reflect unmet need.

Is palliative care support associated with better quality end-of-life care indicators for patients with advanced cancer? A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish the association between timing and provision of palliative care (PC) and quality of end-of-life care indicators in a population of patients dying of cancer. SETTING: This study uses linked cancer patient data from the National Cancer Registry, the electronic medical record system used in primary care (SystmOne) and the electronic medical record system used within a specialist regional cancer centre. The population resided in a single city in Northern England. PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective data from 2479 adult cancer decedents who died between January 2010 and February 2012 were registered with a primary care provider using the SystmOne electronic health record system, and cancer was certified as a cause of death, were included in the study. RESULTS: Linkage yielded data on 2479 cancer decedents, with 64.5% who received at least one PC event. Decedents who received PC were significantly more likely to die in a hospice (39.4% vs 14.5%, P<0.005) and less likely to die in hospital (23.3% vs 40.1%, P<0.05), and were more likely to receive an opioid (53% vs 25.2%, P<0.001). PC initiated more than 2 weeks before death was associated with avoiding a hospital death (≥2 weeks, P<0.001), more than 4 weeks before death was associated with avoiding emergency hospital admissions and increased access to an opioid (≥4 weeks, P<0.001), and more than 33 weeks before death was associated with avoiding late chemotherapy (≥33 weeks, no chemotherapy P=0.019, chemotherapy over 4 weeks P=0.007). CONCLUSION: For decedents with advanced cancer, access to PC and longer duration of PC were significantly associated with better end-of-life quality indicators.

What determines duration of palliative care before death for patients with advanced disease? A retrospective cohort study of community and hospital palliative care provision in a large UK city.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with advanced cancer, several randomised controlled trials have shown that access to palliative care at least 6 months before death can improve symptoms, reduce unplanned hospital admissions, minimise aggressive cancer treatments and enable patients to make choices about their end-of-life care, including exercising the choice to die at home. This study determines in a UK population the duration of palliative care before death and explores influencing factors. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study analysed referrals to three specialist palliative care services; a hospital-based inpatient palliative care team, and two community-based services (hospices). For each patient referred to any of the above services we identified the date of first referral to that team and calculated the median interval between first referral and death. We also calculated how referral time varied by age, sex, diagnosis and type of palliative care service. PARTICIPANTS: 4650 patients referred to specialist palliative care services in Leeds UK between April 2012 and March 2014. RESULTS: Median age of the sample was 75 years. 3903 (84.0%) patients had a diagnosis of cancer. Age, diagnosis and place of referral were significant predictors of duration of palliative care before death. Age was independently associated (J=2 672 078, z=-392046.14, r=0.01) with duration of palliative care regardless of diagnosis. Patients over 75 years have 29 fewer days of palliative care than patients under 50. Patients with non-cancer diagnoses have 13 fewer days of palliative care than patients with cancer. Additionally, patients referred to hospital palliative care receive 24.5 fewer days palliative care than those referred to community palliative care services. CONCLUSIONS: The current timing of referral to palliative care may limit the benefits to patients in terms of improvements in end-of-life care, particularly for older patients and patients with conditions other than cancer.

Analgesic prescribing in palliative care.

Pain management requires a multimodal approach involving pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. It is important to take a detailed history and examine the patient before prescribing any analgesia. This article focuses on assessment and management of pain in palliative care patients.

Management of nausea and vomiting in palliative care.

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms in palliative care and can be highly distressing to patients. This review discusses the mechanisms by which nausea and vomiting are triggered, using case studies to highlight the most common scenarios and how to manage these.

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related pain is complex and multi-dimensional but the mainstay of cancer pain management has predominantly used a biomedical approach. There is a need for non-pharmacological and innovative approaches. Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) may have a role in pain management but the effectiveness of TENS is currently unknown. This is an update of the original review published in Issue 3, 2008. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of TENS for cancer-related pain in adults. SEARCH METHODS: The initial review searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and PEDRO databases in April 2008. We performed an updated search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PEDRO databases in November 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the use of TENS for the management of cancer-related pain in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The search strategy identified a further two studies for possible inclusion. One of the review authors screened each abstract using a study eligibility tool. Where eligibility could not be determined, a second author assessed the full paper. One author used a standardised data extraction sheet to collect information on the studies and independently assess the quality of the studies using the validated five-point Oxford Quality Scale. The small sample sizes and differences in patient study populations of the three included studies (two from the original review and a third included in this update) prevented meta-analysis. For the original review the search strategy identified 37 possible published studies; we divided these between two pairs of review authors who decided on study selection; all four review authors discussed and agreed final scores. MAIN RESULTS: Only one additional RCT met the eligibility criteria (24 participants) for this updated review. Although this was a feasibility study, not designed to investigate intervention effect, it suggested that TENS may improve bone pain on movement in a cancer population. The initial review identified two RCTs (64 participants) therefore this review now includes a total of three RCTs (88 participants). These studies were heterogenous with respect to study population, sample size, study design, methodological quality, mode of TENS, treatment duration, method of administration and outcome measures used. In one RCT, there were no significant differences between TENS and placebo in women with chronic pain secondary to breast cancer treatment. In the other RCT, there were no significant differences between acupuncture-type TENS and sham in palliative care patients; this study was underpowered. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the one additional RCT, the results of this updated systematic review remain inconclusive due to a lack of suitable RCTs. Large multi-centre RCTs are required to assess the value of TENS in the management of cancer-related pain in adults.

Blood transfusions for anaemia in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia occurs in 68% to 77% of patients with advanced cancer, however, only a minority of patients who are admitted to a hospice receive a blood transfusion. It is unclear what the benefit of blood transfusion is in advanced cancer, who is most likely to respond and also for how long. Hence we conducted a systematic review to assess the use of blood transfusion in advanced cancer. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the existing clinical evidence and summarise knowledge gaps regarding blood transfusions for treating anaemia in patients with advanced cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ZETOC and CENTRAL in November 2011. In addition, we checked and citation-tracked the reference lists of all relevant studies and reports. We contacted investigators who were known to be researching this area for unpublished data or knowledge of the grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), before and after studies and interrupted time series (ITS) studies in adults and children, reporting the outcome of blood transfusions in advanced cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent (NP and AH) review authors extracted data and quality scored studies. There were insufficient data to carry out an analysis. MAIN RESULTS: No RCTs were found. We identified 12 before and after studies which included 653 participants and showed a subjective response rate of 31% to 70%. Five studies specifically assessed response using a range of fatigue scales which indicated an early response post transfusion, which was beginning to wane by day 14. Similar results were found for breathlessness. Overall survival ranged from two to 293 days but there was a significant proportion of participants (23% to 35%) who died within two weeks of their transfusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Higher-quality studies are required to determine the effectiveness of blood transfusion at the end of life and, in particular, to determine which patients are most likely to respond and which are not, and the duration of any response. Potential harms of blood transfusion at the end of life (indicated by high 14-day mortality) need to be distinguished from inappropriate transfusion in patients who are dying from advanced cancer.